Motivations and Experiences Regarding Ladies’ Very First Same-sex Sexual Encounters
Amelia E. Talley
Texas Tech University
Mackenzie A. Cook
Catherine A. Schroy
Texas Ladies’ University
Abstract
Utilizing ladies’ self-identified identity that is sexual the present research compares motivations for very first same-sex intimate encounters also connected experiential results. We additionally examine whether relations between intimate motivations and experiential results vary as being a function of females’s intimate identification status. Individuals had been females (N=123), many years 18-to-29 (M=21.59, SD=3.33), who self-reported a brief history of same-sex contact that is sexual. More or less 27% of females defined as exclusively heterosexual (in other words., EH), 35% as mainly heterosexual (in other words., ‘mostly heterosexual’ MH), and 38% as solely or primarily lesbian/ gay, or bisexual (for example., LGB). Individuals finished a survey that is online. MH and LGB females reported very very first same-sex intimate encounters which were more inspired by closeness and research motives, in accordance with EH womenpared to MH and LGB ladies, EH additionally involved with less intimate tasks with regards to very very first same-sex partner. Intimacy and exploration motives had been pertaining to good experiential results during very very first same-sex contact. Associations between motivations and outcomes that are experiential maybe maybe not moderated by intimate identification. Findings subscribe to understanding motivations and experiences linked to ladies’ very very first same-sex intimate encounters and show that not totally all females with a brief history of same-sex intimate contact later determine by having a minority intimate identification label.
Humans take part in sex for many different reasons and, essential for the motivational way of understanding intimate behavior, these motivating factors are thought to contour subsequent experiences and expressions of sex (Cooper, Barber, Zhaoyang, & Talley, 2011). The particular reasons encouraging activity that is sexual including same-sex task, can mirror ones own wider approach or avoidance orientations ( e.g., Birnbaum et al., 2014), that are theorized become connected to distinct neurological and behavioral systems (Birnbaum et al., 2014; Gray, 1970, 1987). As an example, current findings claim that underlying excitatory/inhibitory motivational systems affect the motivation value related to various behavior that is risk-takingBirnbaum et al., 2014; Nagoski et al., 2012) and intimate stimuli (Birnbaum et al. 2014; Ferrey et al., 2012) that will have broad affect psychosocial and intimate functioning (Birnbaum et al. 2014; Impett et al., 2008).
The significance of understanding motivational facets for starting same-sex sexual intercourse is self-evident. This knowledge has got the prospective to tell basic research examining factors that motivate adolescents’ and adults’ research of numerous intimate tourist attractions and impulses and finally notify their self-identification with a certain intimate identification (in other words., intimate identification development; Rosario, Schrimshaw, & Hunter, 2006). The work that is current https://camsloveaholics.com/female/latina has relevance for used researchers who look for to produce interventions that restrict negative effects ( ag e.g., intimately transmitted infections) for people with distinct underlying motivations for intercourse which could potentiate risk-taking during initial and subsequent intimate encounters ( e.g., sex consuming medications or liquor).
Although initial intimate encounters might have impact that is lasting subsequent sexual intercourse and development ( ag e.g., Epstein, Bailey, Manhart, Hill, & Hawkins, 2014), a systematic contrast of adults’ subjective connection with and motivations with regards to their initial intimate encounters according to their self-identified intimate identification, aside from their partner’s biological intercourse, has yet become conducted. A person’s intimate identification is informed by different areas of their sex, including their self-labeling ( ag e.g., heterosexual, bisexual) in addition to their attraction toward and engagement in sex with lovers of varying sex identities (Laumann, Gagnon, Michael, & Michaels, 1994; Morgan, 2013). Findings from qualitative interviews with “self-identified intimate minorities” (Galupo, Davis, Grynkiewiez, & Mitchell, 2014) claim that self-labeling of your respective intimate identification is of main value in considering and one that is defining intimate orientation. Individuals’ present, self-ascribed identity that is sexual regarded as “primary over present and previous experience that may otherwise be interpreted as ‘contradictory’” (p. 16).